Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
08-27-2008, 04:43 AM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 27,798
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
07-22-2008, 06:37 AM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 19,841
Anybody can explain me why if this dll was...
Anybody can explain me why if this dll was protected with CodeVeil, the MSIL code was not encrypted, please? I've tried some configurations with the latest (full) versione of CodeVeil on a dummy dll,...
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
07-10-2008, 07:48 AM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 19,841
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
07-10-2008, 06:15 AM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 19,841
Thank you for your answer kao.
I know this...
Thank you for your answer kao.
I know this product used CodeVeil in past versions, but now I didn't think at it at all because the dll was not encrypted... this puzzle me: why they didn't used the...
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
07-09-2008, 10:07 AM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 19,841
Help understanding this protection
Hi
Trying to break an application, I'm stuck with this (http://rapidshare.com/files/128346687/Designer.rar.html) dll because I can't recognize which protector the publisher used. I already know they...
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
05-18-2008, 06:46 PM
|
Replies: 4
Views: 18,890
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
04-20-2008, 02:53 PM
|
Replies: 32
Views: 59,214
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
04-05-2008, 05:01 PM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-27-2008, 10:37 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
:eek: :eek:
I'm very interested in VM...
:eek: :eek:
I'm very interested in VM technology for protecting software IP.
I hope a nice tutorial will be written.
I wish I can help you guys, but I don't have nay clue:
I trace the...
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-26-2008, 03:22 PM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-26-2008, 05:32 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-25-2008, 06:17 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-25-2008, 06:11 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-18-2008, 04:34 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-17-2008, 05:02 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
Well, I (and all the other members, I think)...
Well, I (and all the other members, I think) would like to know (in depth) first of all the principles this protection in based on, how it's implemented and then the way you found to get around...
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-14-2008, 06:17 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-11-2008, 05:20 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
Join me to this project, please.
I'm in the process of cracking a very well known (and very good, indeed) .NET licensing system. For cracking I mean generate licenses for the component itself (but, if valid, this method could be...
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-11-2008, 05:01 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
03-04-2008, 05:55 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
02-01-2008, 06:33 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
01-28-2008, 10:10 AM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
I've tried this tools on my "preferred"...
I've tried this tools on my "preferred" target, a dll assembly protected with CodeVeil 1.3 (here you can find a dumped and CFF-fixed copy hxxp://rapidshare.com/files/80722569/Designer.zip.html) but...
|
Forum: .NET Reverse Engineering
01-02-2008, 12:43 PM
|
Replies: 467
Views: 382,539
Problem after unpacking Codevel 1.3
Hi to all you guys
I'm not entirely new in this forum because I've followed it as a "guest" for many months, learning a lot in cracking .NET from all of you. Thank you so much! A special thanx to...
|