Reverse Engineering RET Homepage RET Members Reverse Engineering Projects Reverse Engineering Papers Reversing Challenges Reverser Tools RET Re-Search Engine Reverse Engineering Forum Reverse Engineering Links

Go Back   Reverse Engineering Team Board > Reverse Engineering Board > .NET Reverse Engineering
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2011, 05:44 PM
parentelement parentelement is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4

I agree with you. And as a developer I maintain my right to protect my software.
Old 05-06-2011, 10:03 PM
Devine9 Devine9 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 180

This is an interesting thread and I'm prompted to respond.

First, I agree with Kao, and being a long term member of this forum, I think that he reflects the attitude of the administrators on this forum. We do not support "piracy", and provide an outlet for information exchange and discussion surrounding software protection. In fact many of the members of this forum work in a professional capacity for large software protection firms around the world.

In the spirit of good will, and in the same manner that we have always responded to concerns from vendors in the past, I've "cleansed" the thread of any references to this software title, and encourage the members of the forum to keep discussion focused as needed on the protection architecture rather than with specifics on this software, and it is indeed a nice software product.

I've also frozen this thread, as I think that it serves as a good reference for how these matters are dealt with and have been in the past.


Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.