Reverse Engineering RET Homepage RET Members Reverse Engineering Projects Reverse Engineering Papers Reversing Challenges Reverser Tools RET Re-Search Engine Reverse Engineering Forum Reverse Engineering Links

Go Back   Reverse Engineering Team Board > Reverse Engineering Board > Reverse/Social Engineering
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2003, 01:54 AM
Devine9 Devine9 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 180
Default Alternate energy, who would have thought? ;)

Well someone, I dunno who, in RET stumbled across a URL here that you might all find interesting.. an alternate form of energy..

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/bingofuel/

Kind of an interesting article.. might spark some interesting conversation. Theres a lot of alternatives out there.. I think personally that the government really doesn't care at this point.. the current fuel companies are quite happy charging lots and pushing their money towards the economy.. something new might just disrupt that.. a major example being Detroit..

Devine Right [RET]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2003, 02:30 PM
barcode_ barcode_ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: lost in codespace
Posts: 22
Default

what's funny is that the same principle that produces bingo fuel is used in steel working to heat the metal. uses two very large carbon rods just like the reactor :P can't wait till v2.0 i'll run my car with that shit! Also i think santmat posted it btw
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-26-2003, 10:45 PM
kw kw is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 116
Send a message via Yahoo to kw
Default

Actually I think I posted it to RET, but then.. I got the article from someone else.. Doesnt really matter.. Looks interesting indeed, I'm just wondering whether it actually produces more energy than it requires to run?

Greets,
KW
__________________
"It's people like this that make you realize how little you've accomplished. It is a sobering thought, for instance, that when Mozart was my age, he had been dead for two years." - Tom Lehrer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2003, 05:08 PM
Devine9 Devine9 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 180
Default

Well then you get the argument for battery powered cars.. Cause they've had those for ages now.. but the things are worse that gas powered..
Sure gas lets out emissions.. but batteries are non disposable.. much worse for the environment..

Devine Right [RET]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2003, 10:24 PM
kw kw is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 116
Send a message via Yahoo to kw
Default

Batteries are also rechargeable though. You can have one battery replace a LOT of emissions.. Theyre most definitely better for the environment
What would be better of course is something like this that will let out normal gasses that appear in nature (H2O gas, or CO2.. for example. )

-kw
__________________
"It's people like this that make you realize how little you've accomplished. It is a sobering thought, for instance, that when Mozart was my age, he had been dead for two years." - Tom Lehrer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2003, 09:28 AM
Devine9 Devine9 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 180
Default

You've recharge batteries infinitely.. and after 10 years.. they will be very very common in dumps And permanent devices..

Devine Right [RET]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.