Reverse Engineering RET Homepage RET Members Reverse Engineering Projects Reverse Engineering Papers Reversing Challenges Reverser Tools RET Re-Search Engine Reverse Engineering Forum Reverse Engineering Links

Go Back   Reverse Engineering Team Board > Reverse Engineering Board > Reverse Code Engineering
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-19-2008, 08:04 AM
gitolo gitolo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Question Possible conflict?

If I use dongle USB Hasp and SafeDisc, wouldn't be there any conflict? I do not think they both are compatible?

How about the question I asked regarding the part of the program necessary to run the application that I would store in the USB key?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-19-2008, 08:47 AM
gamebit0 gamebit0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gitolo View Post
If I use dongle USB Hasp and SafeDisc, wouldn't be there any conflict? I do not think they both are compatible?
How about the question I asked regarding the part of the program necessary to run the application that I would store in the USB key?
are u author-paranoid?
more important how u use dongle or over protections.
if u put anything in memory && don't crypt it, anyone can get it easy.
write unique customer's data in dongle and the crypt with closed\open keys algorithm. This will stop official users from publishing their dumps.
but not save against carders from China
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:05 AM
Git Git is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Torino
Posts: 1,797
Default

> when every software is come to + one plate form.
> then his cracking is possible, however, I have viedio
> , one person crack it.

I have no idea what "come t + one plate" means, but if you have proof that VMProtect is crackable, then show us. Put up or shut up.

If you protect an exe with the default settings of VMProtect 1.63 or later it IS NOT CRACKABLE today. Period. End of story.

Gitolo - The fist thing you mentioned was that you wanted protection against cracking. Only later did you say you wanted copy protection. They are two very different things. The first is a technical matter, the second is a licensing enforcement issue.

Git
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-19-2008, 07:16 PM
cEnginEEr cEnginEEr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Git View Post
..if you have proof that VMProtect is crackable, then show us. Put up or shut up
Ha ha..nice answer Git, be sure that he dos not have it; in fact I doubt if he understands the meaning of 'VM';

@souze_villy:
cracking a 'VM' is a nightmare even for the pro crackers; if you wanna feel what I say, you can try some of the crackme's posted on http://crackmes.de; also you try your powerful cracking skillz on VM of securom, even though it is fully documented by derko...

@gitolo:
Coping software dos not mean that the attacker can run your software it if you implement a proper protection;
if you wanna use software protection, VMProtect and CodeVisualizer are the best choice for you for sure, but if you insist on using a hardware protection, I would recommend SenseLock or Rockey6 which are based on smartcart technology...in any case you must try to implement the protection properly otherwise expect a crack for you soft..
___________
cE

Last edited by cEnginEEr : 07-19-2008 at 08:49 PM. Reason: correcting "crackme" web address..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:49 PM
el3ashe2 el3ashe2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Default

i have my own protection i called it I Am The Protector
it is new tool to protect your software

ithink the best way to protect your application to use anew protection tool cause most of crackers just follow others threads or videos about cracking if you used anew tool then you can protect it for 1 or 2 years while it cracked then you will use anew update of our protection and new way of protection

my software for sell if you like contact me send PM or aamer@dyetex.net email and we will dicuss this issue
but we can protect VB6 programs only

and you need to know that no one can give you cd protection that no one can crack or copy
cya
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-19-2008, 11:01 PM
unforgiven unforgiven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 44
Default

WMProtect 1.63 is Fully Unpacked and Cracked (I have it).
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-19-2008, 11:43 PM
souze_villy souze_villy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Send a message via MSN to souze_villy Send a message via Yahoo to souze_villy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unforgiven View Post
WMProtect 1.63 is Fully Unpacked and Cracked (I have it).
I also know that this is upacked already but Git is not understand this world, he is senior to me but I think not try to search the web there world is changed. I have information for 1.5.

("come t + one plate") its mean when every software is protected with one technology, then every one try to crack it, and there is million of people working on it, one is must success.

Last edited by souze_villy : 07-19-2008 at 11:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-19-2008, 11:57 PM
el3ashe2 el3ashe2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Default

98% of protection could be unpacked as i told you you need customized tool just for you then no one can crack it easy
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-20-2008, 12:04 AM
souze_villy souze_villy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Send a message via MSN to souze_villy Send a message via Yahoo to souze_villy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by el3ashe2 View Post
98% of protection could be unpacked as i told you you need customized tool just for you then no one can crack it easy
Yes, here is I tell u already that every thin is possible in the future not on this time. I agree with u.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-20-2008, 04:14 AM
souze_villy souze_villy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Send a message via MSN to souze_villy Send a message via Yahoo to souze_villy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steven123 View Post
@souze_villy&unforgiven
Thinking about you don't undertand what's VM at all.
Yes, some Chinese guys had publiced the VMP1.63 at unpack.cn forum but it's not mean the VMP was crackable, at least it's un-reverseable till now. cE had give so clear answer for this topic.
Maybe both of you can show your powerful crack ability with this simplest VMP crackme.
http://rapidshare.de/files/40036610/...e.vmp.rar.html
cEnginEEr is are senior and I 100% agree with him. Here is only discuss Q/A mean every one understand it, what is good and what is wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.